<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SmartSwitch Makes Wasting Energy More Difficult</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gearcrave.com/2009-02-24/stanford-university-smartswitch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gearcrave.com/2009-02-24/stanford-university-smartswitch/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 01:54:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: TurboFool</title>
		<link>http://www.gearcrave.com/2009-02-24/stanford-university-smartswitch/comment-page-1/#comment-35293</link>
		<dc:creator>TurboFool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 01:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearcrave.com/?p=13096#comment-35293</guid>
		<description>Extremely clever and very tactile concept. It makes something we have a hard time envisioning more real. I love it. 
 
And michael, while your idea is certainly practical and a good one, it doesn&#039;t produce the same educational impact as this one. In your circumstance (and with motion-sensitive options), there&#039;s no learning curve. You can turn lights on and without any real consideration for power usage, since thye&#039;ll just turn themselves off anyway. With this principle, though, you get a constant direct &quot;feel&quot; for your usage, which will cause you to be more likely to be directly involved in controlling your usage. And then you&#039;ll be more likely to apply that elsewhere, as well. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Extremely clever and very tactile concept. It makes something we have a hard time envisioning more real. I love it. </p>
<p>And michael, while your idea is certainly practical and a good one, it doesn&#039;t produce the same educational impact as this one. In your circumstance (and with motion-sensitive options), there&#039;s no learning curve. You can turn lights on and without any real consideration for power usage, since thye&#039;ll just turn themselves off anyway. With this principle, though, you get a constant direct &quot;feel&quot; for your usage, which will cause you to be more likely to be directly involved in controlling your usage. And then you&#039;ll be more likely to apply that elsewhere, as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael kastler</title>
		<link>http://www.gearcrave.com/2009-02-24/stanford-university-smartswitch/comment-page-1/#comment-35259</link>
		<dc:creator>michael kastler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearcrave.com/?p=13096#comment-35259</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  However I think it&#039;s easier (and I&#039;m sure a LOT cheaper) to do what i&#039;ve done in my house: I installed a bunch of cheap timer switches - you turn a dial to set how long you want them on - in any area where people typically leave lights on.  The kids bedrooms, the basement.   
 
Simple. Cheap. And no hightech gear drool getting all over my electronics.  :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  However I think it&#039;s easier (and I&#039;m sure a LOT cheaper) to do what i&#039;ve done in my house: I installed a bunch of cheap timer switches &#8211; you turn a dial to set how long you want them on &#8211; in any area where people typically leave lights on.  The kids bedrooms, the basement.   </p>
<p>Simple. Cheap. And no hightech gear drool getting all over my electronics.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
