<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Ferrari California</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gearcrave.com/2008-05-13/2009-ferrari-california/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gearcrave.com/2008-05-13/2009-ferrari-california/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 01:54:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: 1961 Ferrari 250 GT: World&#8217;s Most Expensive Car &#124; GearCrave &#124; The Mens Buying Guide for Gadgets</title>
		<link>http://www.gearcrave.com/2008-05-13/2009-ferrari-california/comment-page-1/#comment-26080</link>
		<dc:creator>1961 Ferrari 250 GT: World&#8217;s Most Expensive Car &#124; GearCrave &#124; The Mens Buying Guide for Gadgets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearcrave.com/?p=2650#comment-26080</guid>
		<description>[...] week, we asked you which car you would prefer: the new 2009 Ferrari California GT, or the classic 1961 Ferrari 250 GT.Â  65% of you opted for the classic, shown above.Â  Turns out, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week, we asked you which car you would prefer: the new 2009 Ferrari California GT, or the classic 1961 Ferrari 250 GT.Â  65% of you opted for the classic, shown above.Â  Turns out, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
